International Encyclopedia of Public Policy and Administration - Vol. 2

By Jay M. Shafritz | Go to book overview

Lerner, Gerda, 1984. "The Rise of Feminist Consciousness." In E. M. Bender, B. Burk, and N. Walker, eds., All of Us Are Present. Columbia, MO: James Madison Wood Research Institute, Stephens College.

Mohr, Judith, 1973. Why Not More Women City Managers? Public Management (February-March): 2-5.

Stewart, Debra, 1990. Women in Public Administration. In Naomi B. Lynn, and Aaron B. Wildavsky, eds., Public Administration: The State of the Discipline. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.

Stivers, Camilla, 1993. Gender Images in Public Administration: Legitimacy and the Administrative State. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

FIELD THEORY. A method for analyzing causal relationships and building scientific constructs. Field theory is an approach to scientific tasks, not a theory about a realm of data. The mathematical representation of a field is the first derivative of x at time t.

Field theory in public administration and in the social sciences owes its origins to the natural sciences. Originally used to conceptualize electromagnetic phenomena in physics, social scientists in psychology adapted field theory as an alternative method for measuring causal relationships. Kurt Lewin ( 1952) deserves much of the credit for developing this theory for the social sciences. Field theory was initially proposed as an approach for problematic concepts, including frustration and need, which eluded traditional methods of analysis. In the study of public policy and management, the use of field theory has the potential to provide insights into problematic, situation specific incidents that elude traditional time-based methods of examination.

Most psychological analyses use a teleological method to examine behavior, inferring the future from historical information. One of the best examples of such psychological constructs commonly used for inference is the stimulus-response pattern. The stimulus-response pattern establishes a time-based (historical) link between the initiating element and its consequence. Field theory does not rely on such measures of the past and present to make inferences; instead, it emphasizes the use of a concept termed the "present field."

Since causation happens from the interaction of forces within the present field, one can make no inferences about future behavior outside the present field. The use of this approach carries with it assumptions about the nature of the field being examined. The present field captures relevant past information and exposes information that is unfolding in the immediate future. Since this is the case, those employing field theory use systematic rather than historical causation to gain inferences. This theory also relies on the idea that living systems maintain equilibrium, which is consistent with Gestalt psychology. The analysis focuses on a single field, and yet encompasses an entire situation.

Since its adaptation into the social sciences, field theory has been used extensively to examine the relationships between behavior and action. In order for a researcher to accurately measure this relationship, he or she must first create a geometric representation of the phenomena. Lewin has argued that this can be accomplished through the adoption of the geometric idea called "hodological space." Through the use of hodological space, concepts including aspiration, frustration, and conflict can be quantified and measured empirically. The field is then constructed from a geometric pattern in this hodological space, and the pattern is used to operationalize the field for analysis, thus enabling scholars to use empirical criteria to infer causality.

Later, scholars of organizational development adopted field theory, incorporating it into the stream of literature known as action research. Its use (though empirically not as rigorous as Lewin's) was justified by field theory's association with systematic action experiments in the social sciences, originated by Lewin and Dewey. Scholars of action research support this relaxed interpretation of field theory and the related concepts that follow it, by arguing that the methodological relaxation corrects the problem of experimental results being disconnected from reality or being uninterpretable.

Public administration scholars and practitioners that specialize in organizational development reap large rewards through the "force field analysis" technique drawn directly from action research. Field theory, as Lewin conceptualized it, though mathematically more precise in its conception, lacks the utility of the force field analysis that public and private organizational development practitioners use for planned change. The empirically rigorous interpretation by Lewin enables practiced researchers in public administration to measure empirically causation based on a field that geometrically structures a difficult behavioral phenomenon, such as conflict, desires, and aspirations. This technique does not enable either the organizational development practitioner or the practiced researcher to extrapolate into the future outside the present field. Field theory can provide empirical understanding of the phenomenon of interest. In public administration, and particularly in public management, the techniques that grew out of field theory are useful for difficult behavioral concepts that escape traditional methods of empirical analysis. It also, by conception, controls for many extraneous factors that might limit the understanding of behavioral phenomena.

ARTHUR J. SEMENTELLI


BIBLIOGRAPHY

French, Wendell L., and Cecil H. Bell, 1995. Organization Development: Behavioral Science Interventions for Organization Improvement. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

-884-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this book

This book has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this book

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
International Encyclopedia of Public Policy and Administration - Vol. 2
Table of contents

Table of contents

Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen
/ 1240

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.