Jurisdiction in Marginal Seas: With Special Reference to Smuggling

By William E. Masterson | Go to book overview
Save to active project


§ 70. The Treaty with England

(1) The Negotiations Leading up to the Treaty

The "rum-row" presented many menaces to the enforcement of law and the preservation of order. The United States Government was faced with a serious problem, which called for immediate and drastic action. It wished to be able to move against this rum fleet and to sweep it from its coasts with as little resistance, or opposition, as possible, especially from the nation whose vessels were the chief offenders. It wished to clear the way for unrestricted action under its four-league statutes. As repeatedly pointed out, it has always upheld the validity of the so-called hovering laws taking jurisdiction far beyond three miles from the shore, but at the same time, it was aware of the wavering attitude of the British Government on this question. In order, therefore, to forestall possible repetition of protests by the British Government, which might handicap its action against the rum fleet, it approached that Government on the question of a treaty under which the United States might seize these vessels on the high seas as far out as twelve miles without objection.1 It seemed better to avoid opposition than to

In the language of the Secretary of State, "But it is apparent that, whatever measures this Government may believe that it is free to adopt in accordance with the principles of international law, these, so far as they are practicable, are far from adequate to meet the exigency; and, further, the diplomatic history of the United States reveals the fact that maritime powers, including the United States itself, are highly sensitive to attempts by foreign authorities to seize their vessels on


Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this page

Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Jurisdiction in Marginal Seas: With Special Reference to Smuggling


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 423

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?