Jackson Versus Biddle: The Struggle over the Second Bank of the United States

By George Rogers Taylor | Go to book overview
Save to active project

Ralph C. H. Catterall:


THE subject in connection with the bank which always arouses most interest is its alleged corrupt connection with politics. It may be said at once that there never has been any evidence produced to show that the bank as a national bank ever spent a dollar corruptly. Yet the accusation was repeated so often that historians have been inclined to accept as proved what was only vehemently asserted, and it begot an incurable suspicion which has endured to this day.

It is self-evident that the bank would be affected by political considerations, since from the beginning to the end of its existence it was to a large extent subject to the will and whim of politicians, and it was frequently attacked by them. Had the board of directors been composed exclusively of canonized saints, still the conciliation of politicians and political forces would have been necessary. The only question worthy of discussion is that of the bank's honesty or corruption in this situation.

Biddle in 1829 rejected as totally inadmissible any attempt to create boards on which the political parties were fairly balanced, and declared that political affiliations should not be considered in such selections. He was right in this; but it must not be supposed that the proposition of a political balance was novel, or that Jackson Democrats first suggested it, or that there was any moral obliquity in such an arrangement. When the first government directors were named, President Madison frankly selected them all from his own political party, and the private stockholders, quite certain that the bank must either be a political machine or possess a balance of parties, elected ten Republicans and ten Federalists as their members of the board. Madison and his capable and honest secretary, A. J. Dallas, then struggled successfully to secure the presidency of the bank for a Republican partisan of no particular ability or experience as a banker, and thus the disasters consequent upon the presidency of William Jones are primarily chargeable to James Madison and Alexander James Dallas.

The policy of political balance then inaugurated was religiously pursued all through the administration of William Jones, and certainly through part of that of Langdon Cheves. Writing to Biddle in 1820, John McKim urges him to assist in the election of a Republican director at Baltimore, "as you know that the Republicans are one short of their number, and the necessity of giving us our share of the Directors, as we do hold more than the half of the stock, and it having been Policy to divide the two Partys in

From The Second Bank of the United States by Ralph C. H. Catterall, copyright 1902 by the University of Chicago Press. Reprinted by permission of the publisher. This extract comprises pp. 243-284, 476 f.


Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this page

Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Jackson Versus Biddle: The Struggle over the Second Bank of the United States


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 120

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?