The Paradox of Change: American Women in the 20th Century

By William H. Chafe | Go to book overview
Save to active project

a class apart, with separate qualifications that severely restricted the type of jobs they could fill. Even sympathizers perceived career women as a special breed. The Institute of Women's Professional Relations declared that "women must be directed into occupations for which they are [peculiarly] adapted," and Frances Perkins told a conference on women that the greatest need of government was for women "who can be humble... and who are willing to begin at the bottom." Character and conscience, she asserted, were more important requirements than brilliance.Such statements reflected a subtle but pervasive attitude that women were less than first-class citizens and had their own place in the worlds of business and government.

In a deeper sense, however, women's inequality was embedded in the social structure, part of a process of living which provided its own best defense against change. In most families, boys and girls were trained to assume substantially different responsibilities. Social, political, and economic institutions were all characterized by a sharp division of sexual roles. And the qualities essential to success in a woman's world were directly opposite those necessary to success in a man's world. In a society which functioned on the premise that men and women occupied completely different spheres, it was not surprising that most women had little choice but to accept the roles of wife and mother. Indeed, woman's place in the home seemed to have been strengthened rather than weakened in the years after 1920. More and more college women married. Over 75 percent of the women responding to George Gallup's 1936 poll disapproved of wives working.And no massive outcry greeted the passage of legislation restricting women's right to gainful employment during the 1930s. If women were enslaved, as feminists claimed, the evidence suggested that their servitude was part and parcel of the entire socialization process, reinforced by institutions and structures that could only be called patriarchal.

The road to economic equality thus proved much longer and more difficult than some women's rights activists had anticipated. The issue of careers for women potentially challenged nearly every entrenched assumption about the roles and responsibilities of the two sexes. For economic equality to become a reality, a fundamental change was required in how men and women thought of each other and in how responsibilities within marriage and the family were distributed. Yet throughout the 1920s and 1930s there was little indication that such a change was either possible or desired. As the nation prepared to enter a new decade, it seemed unlikely that women activists, by themselves, would be able to achieve such fundamental changes. Perhaps only when events created circumstances more conducive to a modification of sex roles would it be possible to seek a redefinition of men's and women's appropriate "place" in American society.


Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this page

Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
The Paradox of Change: American Women in the 20th Century


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 256

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?