# Proceedings of CSCL '97: The Second International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning, December 10-14, 1997, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

By Rogers Hall; Naomi Miyake et al. | Go to book overview

Student3 - [mumbles something then retracts]

Teacher - You learned about the bell curve in math? what does the bell curve represent?

Student3 - [inaudible]

Student4 - There's a few at one end and a bunch in the middle.

Teacher - OK, that's a real important thing to keep in mind as a scientist, do you suppose that scientists just say "op, that's it, I've got this one piece of evidence, or this one individual characteristic that doesn't fit so I'm going to throw this theory out, this theory is no good"

3.3.2 Constructing detailed explanations

This example is from a whole-class discussion that served as a culminating activity for the Finch Scenario. In this discussion students and teacher, together, describe a detailed causal explanation for the episode presented in the problem. The discussion in the following excerpt has two interesting characteristics: the level of detail and extent of the causal story described, and the conversation structure. In the example the teacher responds to students by asking for extensions or continuations, rather than with evaluations. In this way she bridges student remarks and helps create a structure that is closer to student cross talk. Here students are the "talkers of science," unlike traditional question-answer-evaluation structures where the teacher is the "talker of science" ( Lemke, 1990).

[Students from different groups report on their final findings, the teacher synthesizes responses from the different groups and restates a common causal story. The discussion began with a description of environmental conditions that introduces a pressure].

Teacher: And that pressure selected what? This is where I'm not sure I understand. It selected what?

Students - [students call out responses, but it is hard to distinguish statements].

Teacher - The beak? It selected which beak?

Student1 - The longer.

Teacher - The longer beak. Now, I really get fuzzy -- why?

Student2 - Because the only food around was harder.

Teacher - The only food that was left during the dry season was hard?

Student3 - And it was hard to break open.

Teacher - And it was hard to break open. OK. And . . . finish the story . . .

Student2 - So the weaker ones . . .

Teacher - So the weaker ones, the weaker finches could what?

Student4 - The females and the younger ones had a hard time . . .

Students - Cracking

Student6 - Consumption went down

Teacher - How did you know that their food consumption went down?

Student6 - Said so in the field notes

Teacher - Said so in the field notes? OK. I just wanted to make sure you had some evidence for that. Did you all agree? You don't have to -- some of you told me about mating, some of you told me that you thought the beak length let them reach, reach higher, Student7 I think you told me that?

Student7 - Yeah

Teacher - Did you have evidence to support that?

Student7 - Yeah.

Teacher - What did it say?

Student7 - I don't know its not here.

Teacher - What do you remember?

Student7 - Something about reaching for the food.

The level of detail in the explanation that was constructed during the discussion above exemplifies the advantage of whole class, cross-group discussions. Very few groups in the class constructed as complete and detailed an explanation as the one laid out in the quote above, however, this culminating discussion drew on several groups' explanations in order to construct a more complete, and detailed explanation.

Conclusion

Students learning science by collaborating on investigations can be more effective if these collaborations occur in a context that combines three types of supports. First, domain-specific strategic support focuses investigations and discussions on key principles of the domain. Second, teacher-student interactions during small-group investigations augment the support provided in the computer environment by modeling profitable strategies, and answering questions. Third, teacher-student interactions in whole-class forums enable the class to

-297-

If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items
Notes

#### Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

#### Cited page

Proceedings of CSCL '97: The Second International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning, December 10-14, 1997, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Settings

Typeface
Text size
Search within

Look up

#### Look up a word

• Dictionary
• Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 318

## Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

## Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

## Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.