In the Master's Eye: Representations of Women, Blacks, and Poor Whites in Antebellum Southern Literature

By Susan J. Tracy | Go to book overview
Save to active project

Conclusion

AT NO OTHER TIME in the history of the United States has such a small ruling class held so commanding an influence over the economic, political, and intellectual life of a region as did the antebellum planter class. While slaveholding was comparatively widespread among Southerners, the great majority of slaves lived on the largest Eastern and Southwestern cotton plantations and those estates that dotted the Mississippi River. Gavin Wright notes that between 1850 and 1860, "slaveholders controlled between 90 and 95 percent of agricultural wealth." 1 In a region where industrial and commercial wealth was negligible, planters (those owning twenty or more slaves) dominated officeholding in the state and in the Congressional delegations. What is remarkable about the antebellum planter class is not that they defended their class position articulately and effectively--after all, that is what ruling classes do--it is the power they commanded to suppress legitimate debate of slavery as an institution.

It was in this climate of authoritarian suppression that Caruthers, Kennedy, N. B. Tucker, and Simms lived and produced their proslavery novels. Although Tucker and Simms were more vociferous in their proslavery politics than Caruthers and Kennedy, these latter writers agreed with the racial and class prejudices of the planter class and Kennedy produced one of the classic proslavery novels. They used familiar literary conventions formulated by European writers as well as that of the new historical romance developed by Sir Walter Scott to make a Southern contribution to American literature and to formulate the literary proslavery defense for the planter class. What these authors offer, then, is a unique perspective on the planter worldview as it emerged in their fiction. However, had they written from the contradictions and complexities of their own lives, the literature they produced might have been more compelling.

For instance, John Pendleton Kennedy, a lawyer, is the only one of the authors to work in the commercial sector and the only one who refused to own slaves. He held the post of secretary of the navy in the Polk administration and opposed secession. Except for humorous jibes at his countrymen and women, who imagine themselves a neo-aristocracy, his more liberal politics never appear in his work. Similarly, Caruthers, for all his liberalism, married into a wealthy Georgian slaveholding family and celebrated white Christian America's "manifest destiny" to conquer Native Americans and

-213-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
In the Master's Eye: Representations of Women, Blacks, and Poor Whites in Antebellum Southern Literature
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 310

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?