Studies in Ancient Yahwistic Poetry

By Frank Moore Cross Jr.; David Noel Freedman | Go to book overview
Save to active project

Notes to the Introduction
a.
This study has developed out of a seminar on the Psalm conducted by Prof. Albright at the Johns Hopkins University. We are indebted to Prof. Albright for many valuable suggestions.
b.
Scribal errors in the transmission of each text must be recognized. Evidence for inner corruptions in the Samuel and Psalms versions will be found in the notes to the text.
c.
In the first four verses, we find two different but parallel introductions to the ancient hymn (cf. note 2 to the text). II Sam. 22 and Psalm 18 are conflate texts preserving readings from both introductory passages. Efforts were made to harmonize the two texts, with the result that the metrical form and poetic parallelism have almost completely disappeared. Other striking examples of conflation are to be found in vss. 7 (see note 13 to the text), 12-13 (notes 31-33), 28, 29, 38, 39, 49. In certain cases, the variants are preserved in the different texts, in others as conflate readings side by side in the same recension.
d.
In the course of transmission, both texts have undergone general grammatical and orthographic revision. This was an inevitable process in the transmission of literature in the ancient Near East (as is attested by succeeding editions of the same literary document; this is true of Accadian and Egyptian literary works, as well as others). The Psalms rendition, as might be expected, has been revised more completely than that of II Samuel.
e.
There is no evidence whatsoever for the use of matres lectionis in a medial position in the Northern dialect (at least until the fall of Samaria), or the Southern dialect (the first traces of such usage come from the latest pre-exilic period). Final vowel sounds, however, were indicated in Hebrew after the tenth century B.C., by the appropriate vowel letter: he, waw, or yodh.
f.
The use of internal matres lectionis developed in part as a result of the contraction of internal diphthongs in the exilic or post-exilic period. At the same time, historical spelling preserved the waw and yodh of the former diphthongs; these thus became vowel letters representing respectively " and ê. For a detailed discussion of Hebrew orthography, see the forthcoming study by Cross and Freedman.
g.
In addition, there seems to be at least one case in which he appears as the third person masculine singular pronominal suffix (cf. note 34 to the text). This spelling is peculiar to the pre-exilic period.
h.
Another possible case occurs in vs. 46. ௞ל௑י is perhaps to be vocalized yôbīlū.
i.
While it is possible that a few archaic spellings might be introduced coincidentally through scribal error, the accumulation of such spellings in II Sam. 22 tends to rule out that possibility.

-130-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Studies in Ancient Yahwistic Poetry
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 192

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?