Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members. Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

X X

Cited page

Display options
Reset

The Nature of Intelligence

By: Lauren B. Resnick | Book details

Contents
Look up
Saved work (0)

matching results for page

Page 189
Why can't I print more than one page at a time?
While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.

10 Culture, Technology, and Intellect

David R. Olson The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Toronto, Canada

The range of issues with which any theory of intelligence must deal is bounded on one side by considerations of man as a biological animal and on the other side by those of man as a social or cultural animal. Both of these sets of considerations share some common assumptions about the nature of human intelligence. Goodnow (Chapter 9) and Charlesworth (Chapter 8) both make the clear and convincing case that intelligence has everything to do with successful adaptation. Further, they agree that one cannot discuss adaptation usefully unless one specifies clearly what it is that the system is to adapt to. Neither of them is satisfied with the blindness of traditional theories of intelligence to the cognitive demands of various ecological niches. To answer the question of the demands that the environment makes upon intelligence, Charlesworth urges ethological studies of naturally occurring adaptive behavior on the part of children growing up in our culture. Goodnow argues that the answer to this question may come into focus by comparing the intellectual demands of different cultures. Quite different performances are considered adaptive in different cultures. For example, tests that are found to be correlated indices of intelligence in one culture are unrelated in another. Goodnow's sensitive treatment of these cultural differences gives her chapter some of the features of a field manual for the ethological study of intelligence. Up to this point the chapters of Goodnow and Charlesworth are highly congruent.

But what, if anything, does underlie adaptive performances--what Charlesworth calls "highly generalizable and highly usable, life valuable (cognitive) operations that are responsible for intelligent behavior [p. 158]?" The answers offered to this question show more clearly the differences in underlying theoretical bias--in Charlesworth's case, a bias towards a biological account of intelligence, in Goodnow's case, a bias towards a cultural account of intelligence.

-189-

Select text to:

Select text to:

  • Highlight
  • Cite a passage
  • Look up a word
Learn more Close
Loading One moment ...
of 366
Highlight
Select color
Change color
Delete highlight
Cite this passage
Cite this highlight
View citation

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?