Wilbert J. McKeachie University of Michigan
To be honored by a Festschrift is a wonderful thing, and my gratitude is enhanced by the stimulation and pleasure I have received from reading each of the contributions.
Reading the preceding chapters, I am struck by the extent to which some aspect of similarity and difference enters into a number of the contributions. In this chapter I shall try to trace some aspects of that theme through the contributions as they relate to the themes of cognition, motivation, and instruction.
The classical use of similarity in psychology has been in theories dealing with the role of similarities and differences in affecting transfer of learning. Clearly, people and animals use learning in new situations; yet more often than not when we attempt to measure transfer of learning, learners fail to transfer in many situations where we had hoped transfer would occur.
I have argued elsewhere (McKeachie, 1987) that all learning and memory involves transfer; we never use learning in exactly the same situation in which it was learned. At any later period in time, we have changed, and the situation is no longer the same. We simply label the transfer as memory if the situation provides ample cues to the situations in which learning occurred. If the new situation is a little different from the original ones we describe the outcome as near
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information: Book title: Student Motivation, Cognition, and Learning:Essays in Honor of Wilbert J. McKeachie. Contributors: Paul R. Pintrich - Editor, Donald R. Brown - Editor, Claire Ellen Weinstein - Editor. Publisher: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Place of publication: Hillsdale, NJ. Publication year: 1994. Page number: 343.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.