Yearbook of European Law - Vol. 14

By Francis Geoffrey Jacobs | Go to book overview
Save to active project

Competition Law

IAN S. FORRESTER AND CHRISTOPHER NORALL


I. Introduction

1994 was an unusual year in competition law enforcement. An unprecedented number of formal decisions (thirty-three) were taken, although many of them did not appear controversial. The Commission was under political siege for much of the year because of public disenchantment with the European ideal after the débâcle associated with the ratification of the Treaty on European Union. This disenchantment has made the Commission extremely nervous of inciting criticism or mockery in the press. In addition, the Commission has to prepare itself for an attack at the 1996 Intergovernmental Conference by Germany, and other Member States, which will argue in favour of the creation of a European Cartel Authority. Thus on the one hand the Commission has wished to be cautious about engendering controversy; but on the other to demonstrate that it is efficient, productive, and well-able to handle the competition law problems of fifteen Member States (and, for that matter, twenty-five in ten years time).

Pursuing the perhaps unfair process of reflecting on how the Commission can respond to these various preoccupations, we may note three types of action which are widely welcomed. First, the Commission is according a high priority to attacking cartels. Astonishingly high fines were imposed in Cement, totalling about 248,000,000 ECU, and severe fines were imposed in Cartonboard and Steel Beams. It is obvious that smiting price-fixing arrangements involves no political obloquy, and indeed provokes favourable academic and popular comment. It remains to be seen whether the Commission has adequately solved the challenges of evidence-gathering, procedural fairness and other problems involved in conducting a huge investigation covering many countries and tens of thousands of pages of evidence. In any event, attention to cartel-like behaviour is likely to increase, and the Commission should become more efficient in extracting data.

Second, the Merger Task Force continues to attract high praise and to give its 'customers' (those who file notifications of major mergers on to C/O) satisfaction in the form of rapid approval of their agreements. Indeed, the criticisms of the Merger Task Force, to the extent they exist,

____________________
Ian S. Forrester, Q.C. and Christopher Norall, 1995. Both practise law in Brussels, and Ian Forrester is Visiting Professor in European Law at Glasgow University.

-439-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Yearbook of European Law - Vol. 14
Table of contents

Table of contents

Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 764

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?