Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members. Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

X X

Cited page

Display options
Reset

Suicide: Right or Wrong?

By: John Donnelly | Book details

Contents
Look up
Saved work (0)

matching results for page

Page 96
Why can't I print more than one page at a time?
While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
9
Report of the Council
on Ethical and Judicial
Affairs of the AMA
Subject: Physician-Assisted Suicide (Resolution 3, A-93)
Presented by: John Glasson, M.D., Chair
Referred to: Reference Committee on Amendments to Constitution and Bylaws ( Louis R. Zako, M.D., Chair)

Introduction *

Physician-assisted suicide presents one of the greatest contemporary challenges to the medical profession's ethical responsibilities. Proposed as a means toward more humane care of the dying, assisted suicide threatens the very core of the medical profession's ethical integrity.

While the Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs has long-standing policy opposing euthanasia, it did not expressly address the issue of assisted suicide until its June 1991 report, "Decisions Near the End of Life." In that report, the Council concluded that physician-assisted suicide is contrary to the professional role of physicians and that therefore physicians "must not ... participate in assisted suicide." Previously, the Council had issued reports rejecting the use of euthanasia. In June 1977, the Council stated that "mercy killing or euthanasia—is contrary to public policy, medical tradition, and the most fundamental measures of human value and worth." Similarly, in June 1988, the Council reaffirmed "its strong opposition to 'mercy killing.' "

____________________
From Issues in Law and Medicine 10 ( 1994): 91-97. Copyright © 1995 American Medical Association.
*
In accordance with the Joint Report of the Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs and the Council on Constitution and Bylaws (I-91), this report may be adopted, not adopted, or referred. It may only be amended, with the concurrence of the Council, to clarify its meaning.

-96-

Select text to:

Select text to:

  • Highlight
  • Cite a passage
  • Look up a word
Learn more Close
Loading One moment ...
of 335
Highlight
Select color
Change color
Delete highlight
Cite this passage
Cite this highlight
View citation

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?