Contents
| | Preface to the Second Edition | ix |
|
| |
| |
| |
| PART I
The Sources of a Model of Informed Consent 7| 1. | | The Legal Doctrine of Informed Consent | 9 |
| | THE GOALS AND SOURCES OF THE LEGAL DOCTRINE OF
INFORMED CONSENT | 10 |
| | | ELEMENTS OF THE LEGAL DOCTRINE | 14 |
| | |
| | 2. | | The New Ethos of Patient Autonomy | 29 |
| | EARLY CONCERNS ABOUT PATIENT AUTONOMY | 30 |
| | | A REPLY FROM THE PATERNALIST | 32 |
| | | PATIENTS AND PHYSICIANS AS MORAL STRANGERS | 35 |
| | | FREEDOM IN HEALTH CARE | 38 |
| | | THIS IS ALL VERY WELL AND GOOD, BUT ... | 46 |
| | | RETROSPECT AND PROSPECT | 47 |
|
| | 3. | | The Clinical Experience of Patient Autonomy and
Informed Consent | 49 |
| | CLINICIAN PERSPECTIVES ON PATIENT AUTONOMY AND
INFORMED CONSENT | 50 |
| | | EMPIRICAL STUDIES OF INFORMED CONSENT | 52 |
| | | | | EXTERNAL BARRIERS TO PATIENT AUTONOMY AND
INFORMED CONSENT | 60 |
| | |
|
|
-vii-
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information:
Book title: Informed Consent:Patient Autonomy and Clinician Beneficence within Health Care.
Edition: 2nd.
Contributors: Stephen Wear - Author.
Publisher: Georgetown University Press.
Place of publication: Washington, DC.
Publication year: 1998.
Page number: vii.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may
not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.
- Georgia
- Arial
- Times New Roman
- Verdana
- Courier/monospaced
Reset