Problematic Sovereignty: Contested Rules and Political Possibilities

By Stephen D. Krasner | Go to book overview
Save to active project

10
The Road to Palestinian Sovereignty
Problematic Structures or Conventional Obstacles?
SHIBLEY TELHAMI

The perception that a future Palestinian state will have “problematic” sovereignty is justified for a number of reasons. But that the Palestine case is selected as the problematic case in the Middle East over, say, Lebanon indicates the obvious bias in favor of legal sovereignty over the other forms of sovereignty: whereas Lebanon has full international legal sovereignty, it has neither full Westphalian nor full domestic sovereignty. Indeed, in the limited territories that the less-than-sovereign Palestinian Authority controlled following the Oslo accords, it maintained more Westphalian and domestic authority than did Lebanon; despite international law, Israel was more likely to intrude into Lebanese territories than into the Palestinian ones. The very sovereign order in the Middle East, set up by departing colonial powers, witnessed a significant gap in the past half century between the full legal status bestowed on the states and the degree of Westphalian and domestic sovereignty they in fact held.

Nonetheless, the Palestinian case has been seen as problematic from the inception of the current state system in the Middle East. Unlike what they did with other territories they controlled, the British Mandate authorities deferred final status for Palestine to the United Nations and withdrew from it without leaving a new state in place. The United Nations' vision for Palestine was not conventional: the 1947 partition plan (UN General Assembly Resolution 181), which envisioned the division of Palestine into one Arab and one Jewish state, saw the need not only for a separate and unprecedented international status for Jerusalem but also for an “economic union” to be run by

-301-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Problematic Sovereignty: Contested Rules and Political Possibilities
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 367

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?