Page:  of 367
 
a special focus on whether reported levels of effectiveness have changed in
more recent appraisals.
3. To compare the effectiveness of antidepressants to the outcomes for
psychotherapies specifically designed to treat depression.
4. To probe the objectivity of the typical double-blind design employed
to evaluate antidepressants, especially in relation to the issue of using placebos
that are inactive.
5. To offer suggestions of possible ways of balancing deficiencies in current
approaches to measuring the effectiveness of antidepressants and other thera-
peutic agents.

PAST REVIEWS OF ANTIDEPRESSANT DRUG EFFICACY

Since the introduction of antidepressant drugs, many studies have attempted
to assess their effectiveness, and a variety of reviewers have tried their hand
at summarizing the reports that have appeared in the literature. The reviewers
have focused on the antidepressant effects of tricyclic compounds and mono-
amine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs). Obviously there is overlap in the studies
summarized by different authors. However, there is occasional disagreement
among reviewers in categorizing the same investigation as showing evidence
for or against drug use. Results have generally been compressed into either
box scores comparing the number of studies showing drugs to be superior to
placebos versus those showing no difference in outcome or compilations of
the percentage of patients significantly improving on drugs as opposed to
placebos. A search of the literature revealed 15 such reviews. Six assessed the
drug effects as relatively positive and superior to placebos and 7 suggested
more modest, cautious, or equivocal conclusions about drug effects. Two
reviews took a somewhat different tack and attempted to measure the degree
to which groups treated with antidepressant drugs have exceeded non-drug
control groups. Note that these 15 reviews were largely written in the 1960s.

Perhaps a presentation of the positive reviews should begin with the work
of Cole ( 1964) who, in providing an early impressionistic discussion of drug
treatments, noted that two thirds of 15 placebo-controlled studies of depressed
inpatients showed imipramine to be superior. Three placebo-controlled studies
of outpatients also declared imipramine to be the more effective treatment.
Similarly, Davis ( 1965) detailed a box score account of 47 antidepressant drug
studies. Most of these reports were placebo controlled and double-blind. The
drug was declared superior to placebos in 68% of the studies. At a later date,
Davis, Klerman, and Schildkraut ( 1968) tabulated box scores for 52 double-
blind placebo-controlled studies of tricyclics and 28 similarly controlled inves-

-2-

Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com

Publication Information: Book Title: The Limits of Biological Treatments for Psychological Distress: Comparisons with Psychotherapy and Placebo. Contributors: Seymour Fisher - editor, Roger P. Greenberg - editor. Publisher: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Place of Publication: Hillsdale, NJ. Publication Year: 1989. Page Number: 2.
    
This feature allows you to create and manage separate folders for your different research projects. To view markups for a different project, make that project your current project.
This feature allows you to save a link to the publication you are reading or view all the publications you have put on your bookshelf.
This feature allows you to save a link to the page you are reading, which you can later return to from Projects.
This feature allows you to highlight words or phrases on the publication page you are reading.
This feature allows you to save a note you write on the publication page you are reading.
This feature allows you to create a citation to the page you are reading that you can paste into your paper. Highlight a passage to include that passage as a quotation.
This feature allows you to save a reference to a publication you are reading for your bibliography or generate a bibliography you can paste into your paper.
This feature allows you to print the page you are reading, including your notes or highlights (IE users must have "print background colors and image" setting selected.)
This feature allows you to look up words in encyclopedia.
  About Questia Tools
Close Window  
Questia's powerful research tools allow you to highlight, take notes, bookmark and even create instant citations and bibliographies. To use these features and save hours of work, you must create a Questia account.
Need a Questia account?
Sign up for a FREE trial now. Save time, stress and hassle, and get better grades with trusted, online research.

» Click here for our free trial

Already have a Questia account? Login now!
Error
Working...
Printing Preferences
Format for black and white printer: On Off
Print highlights: On Off
Print notes: On Off
Choose one of the options for printing:
Print this page (No Charge)
Print pages to