a special focus on whether reported levels of effectiveness have changed in more recent appraisals.
3.
To compare the effectiveness of antidepressants to the outcomes for psychotherapies specifically designed to treat depression.
4.
To probe the objectivity of the typical double-blind design employed to evaluate antidepressants, especially in relation to the issue of using placebos that are inactive.
5.
To offer suggestions of possible ways of balancing deficiencies in current approaches to measuring the effectiveness of antidepressants and other thera- peutic agents.
PAST REVIEWS OF ANTIDEPRESSANT DRUG EFFICACY
Since the introduction of antidepressant drugs, many studies have attempted to assess their effectiveness, and a variety of reviewers have tried their hand at summarizing the reports that have appeared in the literature. The reviewers have focused on the antidepressant effects of tricyclic compounds and mono- amine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs). Obviously there is overlap in the studies summarized by different authors. However, there is occasional disagreement among reviewers in categorizing the same investigation as showing evidence for or against drug use. Results have generally been compressed into either box scores comparing the number of studies showing drugs to be superior to placebos versus those showing no difference in outcome or compilations of the percentage of patients significantly improving on drugs as opposed to placebos. A search of the literature revealed 15 such reviews. Six assessed the drug effects as relatively positive and superior to placebos and 7 suggested more modest, cautious, or equivocal conclusions about drug effects. Two reviews took a somewhat different tack and attempted to measure the degree to which groups treated with antidepressant drugs have exceeded non-drug control groups. Note that these 15 reviews were largely written in the 1960s.
Perhaps a presentation of the positive reviews should begin with the work of Cole ( 1964) who, in providing an early impressionistic discussion of drug treatments, noted that two thirds of 15 placebo-controlled studies of depressed inpatients showed imipramine to be superior. Three placebo-controlled studies of outpatients also declared imipramine to be the more effective treatment. Similarly, Davis ( 1965) detailed a box score account of 47 antidepressant drug studies. Most of these reports were placebo controlled and double-blind. The drug was declared superior to placebos in 68% of the studies. At a later date, Davis, Klerman, and Schildkraut ( 1968) tabulated box scores for 52 double- blind placebo-controlled studies of tricyclics and 28 similarly controlled inves-
-2-
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication Information: Book Title: The Limits of Biological Treatments for Psychological Distress: Comparisons with Psychotherapy and Placebo. Contributors: Seymour Fisher - editor, Roger P. Greenberg - editor. Publisher: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Place of Publication: Hillsdale, NJ. Publication Year: 1989. Page Number: 2.
Add a Shared Note
Shared Notes are comments made by Questia users on books,
book pages, or articles that inform other users and enhance
the Questia research community.
This feature allows you to create and manage separate folders for your different research projects. To view markups for a different project, make that project your current project.
This feature allows you to save a link to the publication you are reading or view all the publications you have put on your bookshelf.
This feature allows you to save a link to the page you are reading, which you can later return to from Projects.
This feature allows you to highlight words or phrases on the publication page you are reading.
This feature allows you to save a note you write on the publication page you are reading.
This feature allows you to create a citation to the page you are reading that you can paste into your paper. Highlight a passage to include that passage as a quotation.
This feature allows you to save a reference to a publication you are reading for your bibliography or generate a bibliography you can paste into your paper.
This feature allows you to print the page you are reading,
including your notes or highlights (IE users must have "print background colors and image" setting selected.)
This feature allows you to look up words in encyclopedia.
Questia's powerful research tools allow you to highlight, take notes, bookmark and even create instant citations and bibliographies. To use these features and save hours of work, you must create a Questia account.
Need a Questia account? Sign up for a FREE trial now. Save time, stress and hassle, and get better grades with trusted, online research.