ʻAppearances in the dark are apt to look different in the light of day.ʻ' 1 Before we begin our analysis of the procedural protections afforded by the Due Process Clauses, we must examine four critical preliminary issues. First, we must consider who qualifies as a ʻpersonʻ protected by due process. Do the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments protect only individuals or are noncorporeal entities- like corporations, unions, and even governments themselves-also protected? Are all individuals considered ʻpersonsʻ within the meaning of the Due Process Clauses or are only American citizens or those admitted for permanent residence protected? Second, since the Due Process Clauses protect persons from only gov- ernmental, not private, action, we must next consider who qualifies as a ʻstateʻ or ʻgovernmentʻ actor. Put differently, when are private parties sufficiently involved in governmental action to qualify as state actors for constitutional purposes? Third, we must define the interests protected by the Due Process Clauses. Does the word ʻpropertyʻ entail anything more than real estate? Is tangible personal property protected? What about non-tangible interests, like employment and rep- utation ? And how broadly are the words ʻlifeʻ and ʻlibertyʻ read? Finally, we must consider the state of mind that the governmental actor must possess at the time she deprives a person of a protected interest to trigger due process protec- tion. If a state actor's mere negligence causes a person to lose a protected interest, has there been a ʻdeprivationʻ for due process purposes, or must the state actor actually intend to deprive her of a protected interest to trigger due process protec- tion ? If negligent acts do not satisfy the state-of-mind requirement, how about grossly negligent or reckless acts? It is to these critically important preliminary issues that we now turn. ʻPERSONSʻ PROTECTED BY DUE PROCESS Webster's Dictionary defines a ʻpersonʻ as ʻa human being, whether man, woman or child.ʻ' Taken at face value, this definition suggests that aliens clandestinely
-21-
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication Information: Book Title: Procedural Due Process: A Reference Guide to the United States Constitution. Contributors: Rhonda Wasserman - author. Publisher: Praeger. Place of Publication: Westport, CT. Publication Year: 2004. Page Number: 21.
Add a Shared Note
Shared Notes are comments made by Questia users on books,
book pages, or articles that inform other users and enhance
the Questia research community.
This feature allows you to create and manage separate folders for your different research projects. To view markups for a different project, make that project your current project.
This feature allows you to save a link to the publication you are reading or view all the publications you have put on your bookshelf.
This feature allows you to save a link to the page you are reading, which you can later return to from Projects.
This feature allows you to highlight words or phrases on the publication page you are reading.
This feature allows you to save a note you write on the publication page you are reading.
This feature allows you to create a citation to the page you are reading that you can paste into your paper. Highlight a passage to include that passage as a quotation.
This feature allows you to save a reference to a publication you are reading for your bibliography or generate a bibliography you can paste into your paper.
This feature allows you to print the page you are reading,
including your notes or highlights (IE users must have "print background colors and image" setting selected.)
This feature allows you to look up words in encyclopedia.
Questia's powerful research tools allow you to highlight, take notes, bookmark and even create instant citations and bibliographies. To use these features and save hours of work, you must create a Questia account.
Need a Questia account? Sign up for a FREE trial now. Save time, stress and hassle, and get better grades with trusted, online research.