attack rather than an admission, is advanced by
the radical camp. "We liberals," they say, "are in-
terested in people. Our concern is with human
beings, while you Conservatives are preoccupied
with the preservation of economic privilege and
status." Take them a step further, and the Lib-
erals will turn the accusations into a class argu-
ment: it is the little people that concern us, not
the "malefactors of great wealth."

Such statements, from friend and foe alike, do
great injustice to the Conservative point of view.
Conservatism is not an economic theory, though
it has economic implications. The shoe is precisely
on the other foot: it is Socialism that subordinates
all other considerations to man's material well-
being. It is Conservatism that puts material things
in their proper place -- that has a structured view
of the human being and of human society, in
which economics plays only a subsidiary role.

The root difference between the Conservatives
and the Liberals of today is that Conservatives
take account of the whole man, while the Liberals
tend to look only at the material side of man's
nature. The Conservative believes that man is, in
part, an economic, an animal creature; but that
he is also a spiritual creature with spiritual needs
and spiritual desires. What is more, these needs
and desires reflect the superior side of man's na-
ture, and thus take precedence over his economic
wants. Conservatism therefore looks upon the en-

-10-