The same fund had supplied the cost of completing the south wall of the acropolis. Satisfied with his civic victory over his accusers, Cimon was before long again absent from Athens on an expedition of which, as of so many others during this period, no parti- culars remain. But the party of his opponents had not been idle during his absence, and the success with which they could avail themselves of it goes far to prove that the for- bearance of Pericles in the prosecution might be due to con- sciousness of strength that could afford to be magnanimous. The most ardent and active promoter of change at this time was Ephialtes. Under which of the many influences that dissolve the alliances of politicians he had renounced his former connection with Cimon does not appear; the breach was certainly serious and final. He seems to have been one of the first among Athenian politicians who per- ceived the advantage of uninterrupted presence at the centre of political action. We 1 read how, at some time after the battle of Mycale, he sailed unmolested beyond the Cheli- donian islands with a squadron of thirty ships, as Pericles on another occasion with fifty, but this is the only notice that occurs of his holding a command. He evidently united with an energetic and even passionate character the sagacity to discern at what point an old established system might be assailed not only with success, but with the beat promise of a series of successes afterwards. There is very strong presumption that the great attack of Ephialtes upon the Areopsgus dates several years later; but intermediately, though at uncertain dates, very consider- able reductions, probably due to his influence and exertions, had been made in the authority of the archons, the council, and other magistracies,--especially through the substitution of appointment by lot instead of by election. ____________________ -383- |