by its creator Sherwood Schwartz as being a "socialistic community," while actor Jim Backus described the island as a "benign welfare state." 81 In that the television situation comedy is a dramatic form ontologically grounded in social discord and conflict, it could not have helped but partially expose the fissures in liberal democratic ideology. Even in their absence, the substantive political issues of the times--civil rights, the growth of the welfare state, American imperialism--were the repressed but persistent subjects of 1960s situation comedies. Not until the end of the decade with the appearance of Julia ( September 17, 1968, to May 25, 1971)--a landmark program in that it sympathetically depicted the struggles of a black, female, single parent--did the sitcom begin to reconcile the ideological discontinuities between polity and popular art that had surfaced during the 1960s. By 1968, the "politics of protest" had been modified into the "new politics" of politically committed students, minorities, and members of the underclass who rallied under the banner of the revitalized Democratic party. But by midyear, the era of ideological and political ferment seemed to come to an end with the assassinations of the Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr., and Bobby Kennedy. In the following decade, the television situation comedy would come to reflect the partial assimilation of counterhegemonic social ideologies that took root during the 1960s. "Social relevance," a catch phrase that gained currency on many a university campus in the push to update curricula, became the watchword for the sitcoms of the 1970s. The pathbreaking sitcoms of Norman Lear and Bud Yorkin were in particular distinguished by their tendency to generate con- troversy. Despite their daring treatment of certain social taboos, the sitcoms of Lear and Yorkin represented the consolidation of, rather than challenge to, the dominant liberal ideology. As already seen, the situation comedy as an aes- thetically veiled form of political communication has proven to be a resilient and infinitely adaptable sociodramatic means of achieving and maintaining the structured consensus so vital to the ongoing legitimacy of the liberal democratic state. NOTES | 1. | William Appleman Williams, America in a Changing World: A History of the United States in the Twentieth Century ( New York: Harper & Row, 1978), p. 354. | | | | | 2. | Samuel Bowles, David M. Gordon, and Thomas E. Weisskopf, Beyond the Waste Land: A Democratic Alternative to Economic Decline ( Garden City, N.Y.: Anchor Press/ Doubleday, 1983), pp. 72-73. | | | | | 3. | See Richard A. Blum and Richard D. Lindheim, Primetime: Network Television Programming ( Boston: Focal Press, 1987), pp. 145-146. | | | | | 4. | J. Fred MacDonald, Who Shot the Sheriff? The Rise and Fall of the Television Western pp. 113-114. | | | | | 5. | William L. O'Neill, Coming Apart: An Informal History of America in the 1960's ( New York: Quadrangle Books, 1971), p. 13. | | | | -82- |