IV PUBLIC CAPITAL EXPENDITURE 1. Public Investment in Nyasaland Capital expenditure in Nyasaland is undertaken by both the Federal and the territorial governments, in connection with the functions for which they are individually responsible. The expenditures which have been made by the two governments since the establishment of the Federation are set out in Table I below. TABLE I Public Capital Expenditure in Nyasaland since Federation (£ thou.) | | 1954-55 | 1955-56 | 1956-57 | 1957-58 | 1958-59 | | Nyasaland Government | 755 | 1,237 | 1,902 | 2,713 | 2,749 | | Federal Government | 1,229 | 1,383 | 1,693 | 912 | 793 | | Total | 1,984 | 2,620 | 3,595 | 3,625 | 3,542 | Sources. Data for Nyasaland are taken from the Jack Report (Table I on page 63 of the Report). Data for the Federal Government were supplied by the Federal Treasury. | The average figure for this five-year period, taking both governments to- gether, is about £3.1 million per annum. This is considerably higher than the annual average for the Nyasaland Government in the five full years preceding Federation, which was approximately £1 million. 1 These two figures are not comparable, since the Nyasaland Government's capital expenditure in recent years, even if the territory had remained separate, would certainly have exceeded the 1948-52 levels; but there can be no doubt that Federation has led to a higher rate of public investment than would have been possible if Nyasaland had remained separate. The memorandum on Fiscal Benefits Accruing to Nyasaland from Federation puts the difference at £1 million per annum. It is a common practice to add this estimated difference to the fiscal gains which the Nyasaland Government has made on current account under the present financial arrangements. But this is not a legitimate procedure. It can be defended on the grounds that the additional funds which have been available to finance capital expenditure would have to be found, in the absence of Federation, from the Nyasaland Government's current revenues. As will be seen in the next section, however, this is not necessarily the case. Even if it were true, the argument ignores the fact that, while the gains on current account create no liability to the Nyasaland Government, the higher level of public investment has brought about corresponding increases in its financial obligations. This is obviously the case with respect to investment carried out by the Nyasaland Government itself, in so far as this is financed by borrowing. ____________________ -50- |