active in the helping role than in other methods. In some applications of PAL, the definition of peer might seem somewhat stretched, as when university students tutor young school children. However, a peer always remains very different from a salaried, and ultimately controlling, profes- sional teacher. Archaic perceptions of PAL considered the peer helper as a surrogate teacher, in a linear model of the transmission of knowledge, from teacher to peer helper to tutee. Traditionally, there was an assumption that peer helpers should be among the best students (i.e., those who were most like the professional teachers). However, the differential in levels of ability and interest in such a situation could prove understimulating for the helper, who was unlikely to gain cognitively from the interactions. Later, it was realized that the peer helping interaction was qualitatively different from that between a professional teacher and a child or young person, and involved different advantages and disadvantages. Recently, there has been more interest in deploying helpers whose capabilities are nearer to those of the helped, so that both members of the pair find some cognitive challenge in their joint activities. The helper is intended to be learning by teaching and is also a more proximate and credible model under these circumstances. Thus, PAL projects now almost always target gains for both helpers and helped; double added value. WHY IS PAL IMPORTANT? Raising Standards The education system is frequently criticized for failing to raise standards in literacy, numeracy, and science and is often blamed for apparent declines. Additionally, there is criticism for failing to promote the development of vocationally relevant transferable skills in high schools. The quality and cost-effectiveness of teaching and learning methods and resources has never before been so closely scrutinized. The occasional clarion calls of "back to basics" are paradoxical. Didactic curriculum delivery, coupled with crude and brief summative assessment methods, are known to promote a surface approach to learning--the kind of learning of which machines are now capable--rather than a deep or intelligent approach. Government attempts to be seen to be doing something about it too frequently result only in increased administration and bureaucracy, reduc- ing the time, energy, motivation, and other resources available for teaching. -2- |