Roman Catholics it soon 'melted away'. 1 Many Tories, especially in the west, welcomed William in the belief that he had come over to bring his father-in-law to his senses, rather than to take the crown. After the Revolution, most of them accepted him as king de facto if not de jure, though driven into a false position by the imposition of the oaths of abjuration by which the Whig Junto endeavoured to drive them out of office. Although some leading Tories engaged in plots with James and Louis XIV, and although their belief in a foreign policy based on seapower rather than inter- vention on the Continent conflicted with William's aims, he resolutely refused to place himself in the power of one side only, so that their party also enjoyed its share of Crown and Government patronage at national and local level. Leading Tories in opposition joined Whigs in opposition in the 1690s in an influential country party, which secured the passing of the Triennial Act, of legislation to reduce the number of placemen in Parliament, and secured the disbandment of the army after the peace of Ryswick on the grounds that the militia was the only constitutional force in peace time. The whole Tory party rejoiced at the accession of Queen Anne, a devout Anglican, whose heart, as she proclaimed was 'wholly English', but she resolutely refused to make herself dependent on only one party, and until just before her death resisted demands by Convocation and by High Tories for an end to the practice of occasional con- formity by which dissenters qualified for office by taking the sacrament once in a while. They opposed bills to naturalise foreign Protestants from 1709 to 1748 because, be they Dutch, German or French, they were dissenters and invariably became Whigs once they were in England. 2 The system of mixed ministries had worked well enough to carry the country through its immense war effort during Marlborough's wars, even though the court party tended on occasions to fragment on party lines. For this latter reason, the ablest party managers would have liked single-party governments. Thomas, Marquis of ____________________ | 1 | J. R. Jones, The Revolution of 1688289; C. Dalton, English Army Lists and Commission Registers ii, pp. v, xxvii. For the general implications of the Revolution, see J. P. Kenyon, Revolution Principles; Mark Goldie, "'Edmund Bohun and Jus Gentium in the Revolution Debate 1689-93'", Historical Journal XX ( 1977) 569-86. | | 2 | See H. Horwitz, Parliament, Policy and Politics in the Reign of William III; G. Holmes, British Politics in the Age of Anne; W. A. Speck, Tory and Whig. | -2- |