The size of bacteria is in inverse ratio to their importance in the primordial and present history of the earth. The largest known are slightly above 1 / 20 of a millimetre in length and 1 / 200 of a millimetre in width. 1 The smaller forms range from 1 / 2000 of a millimetre to organisms on the very limit of microscopic vision, 1 / 5000 of a millimetre in size, and to the bacteria beyond the limits of microscopic vision, the existence of which is inferred in certain diseases. The chemical consti- tution of these microscopic and ultramicroscopic forms is doubtless highly complex. The number of these organisms is inconceivable. In the daily excretion of a normal adult human being it is estimated that there are from 128,000,000,000 to 33,000,000,000,000 bacteria, which would weigh approximately 55 / 10 grams when dried, and that the nitrogen in this dried mass would be about 0.6 gram, constituting nearly one-half the total intestinal nitrogen. 2 The discovery of the chemical life of the lowliest bacteria marks an advance toward the solution of the problem of the origin of life as important as that attending the long-prior dis- covery of the chemical action of chlorophyll in plants. In their power of finding energy or food in a lifeless world the bacteria known as prototrophic, or "primitive feeders," are not only the simplest known organisms, but it is probable that they represent the survival of a primordial stage of life chemistry. These bacteria derive both their energy and their nutrition directly from inorganic chemical compounds: such types were thus capable of living and flourishing on the lifeless earth even before the advent of continuous sunshine and long ____________________ | 1 | The influenza bacillus, 5 / 10 X 2 / 10 of a micron (1 / 1000 mm.) in size, and the germ of infantile paralysis, measuring 2 / 10 of a micron, are on the limit of microscopic vision. Beyond these are the ultramicroscopic bacteria, beyond the range of vision, some of which can pass through a porcelain filter. See Jordan Edwin O., 1908, pp. 52, 53. | | 2 | Kendall A. I., 1915, p. 209. | -81- |