its climax when he contrasted Oxford with his own
mother university. But a year or two later when he
wrote his ' Life of Plutarch' he had no occasion to flatter
anyone; and in this Life -- which as a critical essay de-
serves more attention than it seems to receive -- he went
out of his way to recall the days when he read Plutarch in
the library of Trinity College and to add, with manifest
sincerity, 'to which foundation I gratefully acknowledge
a great part of my education'. This brief acknowledge-
ment tells us more of his life at Cambridge than we learn
from the college record of his gating for disobedience to
the Vice-Master, or from the rumour which was raked
up in his later life of his discomfiture at the hands of a
young nobleman on whom he had written verses. Dryden
was as good a Greek scholar as any English poet between
Milton and Gray, and he had not learned all his Greek
under Dr Busby at Westminster.

We in our turn are under an obligation to members of
this college for their work on Dryden, and to two of them
in particular -- W. D. Christie and A. W. Verrall. After
Malone with his unexcelled capacity for research had
collected the material for our biographical and explana-
tory accounts of Dryden, and after Walter Scott had
brought out his great edition and furnished it with what
is still the most readable life, little work was done on
Dryden for about fifty years. Roughly in the twenties of
the last century, even while Keats was discovering him,
Dryden entered on the period when he suffered more
neglect than at any other time. But in 1870 there ap-
peared the Globe edition with these words on the title-
page, 'edited with a memoir, revised text, and notes, by
W. D. Christie, M.A., of Trinity College, Cambridge',
and also with these words -- 'Glorious John Dryden'.

-2-