Prolegomenon J. Bruce Overmier University of Minnesota William E. Montague Navy Personnel Research & Development Center James J. Jenkins University of South Florida A little over 30 years ago Lee Cronbach published a seminal article in which he challenged psychologists to integrate the two disjoint disciplines of differential and experimental psychology. Cronbach specifically called for the study of the interactions between individual differences variables (aptitudes) and experimen- tal manipulations (or treatments). Such interactions have become generically known to differential, educational, industrial/organizational, personality, and experimental psychologists as aptitude-treatment interactions. Following the ap- pearance of Cronbach's article, several researchers turned their attention to this area. Some of the most significant discussions emerging from this area have pertained to the study of individual differences in learning. The task at hand has not been an easy one, though. An early conference in 1965 on these issues held at the University of Pittsburgh ( R. M. Gagné, Editor, Learning and Individual Differences. Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merrill) paved the way for later advances in research in this area, and anticipated many subsequent developments in the information processing approach to human abili- ties. Other conferences have looked specifically at relevant methodological is- sues, such as the one at the University of Wisconsin in 1962 ( C. W. Harris, Editor, Problems in Measuring Change, Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin). Although there has been substantial growth during the past decade in research concerned with ability, motivation, and methodological approaches to learning and individual differences, much of this research has developed along parallel tracks, with too limited interaction between researchers who investigate related topics. However, guided by contemporary theories of cognition from the mid-1970s, many productive research programs have been initiated in psychol- -xix- |