By 1600 there were some hundreds of these British incorporations -- usually, but not always, known as boroughs or cities. They possessed widely varying juris- dictions and even wider variation in internal structure. Some few of the more ancient among them claimed rights and privileges by prescription; but, in the overwhelming majority of cases, such rights and privileges had been in- corporated in a formal document or charter. While a few of these charters were seignorial in origin, for the most part they represented direct grants from the Crown. The majority appertained to areas which to-day would scarcely be termed urban. In a few places there had taken place an elaborate structural development often interwoven with the old guild. Such, in brief, were the British municipal corporations when the initial settlements were made in America. (B) Of more importance to the understanding of the colonial incorporations were the developments in England be- tween 1600 and 1775. 4 This was the period in which the municipal corporation crossed the Atlantic and found permanent footing on American shores. The Stuarts continued and extended the policy of the Tudors, in so far as control of the boroughs was sought as an instrument to consolidate power in royal hands. Under James I this policy revealed no new major developments; and under Charles I many of the boroughs, particularly ____________________ | 4 | For this period, cf. particularly the thorough study by Beatrice and Sidney Webb, The Manor and the Borough, 2 vol., upon the findings of which the present author rests heavily in this introductory chap- ter. Other useful sources are Madox T., Firma Burgi; Merewether H. A. , and Stephens A. J., History of Municipal Corporations, Lon- don, 1835, 3 vol.; Maitland F. W., Township and Borough; First Re- port of the Commission on Municipal Corporations (H. C. 116, 1835). | -17- |