and "her" of every letter. And this shall be
a paper of reparation to Mrs. Dingley.

No one else in literary history has been so de-
frauded of her honours. In love "to divide is
not to take away," as Shelley says; and Ding-
ley's half of the tender things said to MD is
equal to any whole, and takes nothing from
the whole of Stella's half. But the sentimen-
talist has fought against Mrs. Dingley from the
outset. He has disliked her, shirked her, mis-
conceived her, and effaced her. Sly sentimen-
talist--he finds her irksome. Through one of
his most modern representatives he has but
lately called her a "chaperon." A chaperon!

MD was not a sentimentalist. Stella was
not so, though she has been pressed into that
character; D certainly was not, and has in this
respect been spared by the chronicler; and MD
together were "saucy charming MD," "saucy
little, pretty, dear rogues," "little monkeys
mine," "little mischievous girls," "nautinau-
tinautidear girls," "brats," "huzzies both,"
"impudence and saucy-face," "saucy noses,"
"my dearest lives and delights," "dear little
young women," "good dallars, not crying dal-
lars" (which means "girls"), "ten thousand
times dearest MD," and so forth in a hundred

-9-