cially and without exception discountenanced by the Catholic Church, has never been encouraged, and song, like prayer, is looked upon as essentially a liturgic office. In the Protestant Church the barrier of an interme- diary priesthood between the believer and his God is broken down. The entire membership of the Christian body is recognized as a universal priesthood, with access to the Father through one mediator, Jesus Christ. This conception restores the offices of worship to the body of believers, and they in turn delegate their admin- istration to certain officials, who, together with certain independent privileges attached to the office, share with the laity in the determination of matters of faith and polity. It was a perfectly natural result of this principle that congregational song should hold a place in the Prot- estant cultus which the Catholic Church has never sanctioned. The one has promoted and tenaciously maintained it; the other as consistently repressed it, -- not on æsthetic grounds, nor primarily on grounds of devotional effect, but really through a more or less dis- tinct perception of its significance in respect to the theoretical relationship of the individual to the Church. The struggles over popular song in public worship which appear throughout the early history of Protes- tantism are thus to be explained. The emancipated lay- man found in the general hymn a symbol as well as an agent of the assertion of his new rights and privileges in the Gospel. The people's song of early Protestant- ism has therefore a militant ring. It marks its epoch -224- |