they were left in the main to take their chances in a sort of struggle for existence. A contributing fac- tor in shaping the different policy pursued by Spain in its final form was the conquest by Cortés and Pizarro of states of a developed civilization, them- selves in turn resting on the conquest and combina- tion of smaller political aggregates. The peoples under the sway of Montezuma and Atahualpa accept- ed a change of rulers with no great resistance, and became the subjects of the king of Spain, whose cap- tains displaced their earlier conquerors. Only in the case of the wilder tribes, the "unreduced" Indians, do we have a situation more like that in English America. 1 The inhabitants of the newly discovered tropical Africa knew Europeans only as slave-buyers and kidnappers; that a similar fate did not befall the natives of America may be attributed to the long- continued efforts of the Spanish kings and mission- aries, seconded by public opinion in Spain. 2 These new subjects must be converted, must be reduced to civilized life and to regular industry. It was a com- pulsory process, and it bore down at times in the remoter fields of execution with terrible severity, especially on such as were not inured to work. That the Indians, excepting prisoners of war and the wild Caribs resisting conquest, should not, either in theory ____________________ | 1 | Cf. Farrand, Basis of American History, chap. xii. | | 2 | See Armstrong, Charles V., II., 100, for petitions of the com- munes and the cortes for the freedom of the Indians. | -254- |