the youngster in love with the aging courtesan at one sitting, breathlessly, he said. "Not one weakness, not one redundancy, nothing commonplace!" Why in the world, he wondered, had none of the critics compared her young hero or villain with Benjamin Constant's "insupportable" Adolphe? "It's the same subject in reverse, almost." On the whole this was higher praise than Proust's, and deservedly higher; for in the three intervening years Colette had extended and intensified her art. Gide quibbled also, or rather, he suggested that with his natural uneasiness and malicious humor, if he took a little more trouble, in all probability he would find something quibble-worthy. "I'd like to re-read it but I'm afraid to. What if it were to disappoint me, upon second read- ing? Oh, quick, let me mail this letter before I consign it to the waste-basket!" It is pleasant and, I think, appropriate to begin with a glance at these two little documents of literary history. For, now that the inditers are both dead and gone, Colette is the greatest living French fiction-writer. I know that in critical prose, as a rule, the effect of the superlative, greatest, is just emotional. It is not really susceptible of analysis, at least not of proof. Even the comparative, greater, is unhandy in any limited number of pages, as it calls for some examination of those who may be thought comparable. Greater than Mauriac? Greater than Martin du Gard, Jules Romains, Montherlant, Sartre? Yes, of course. But I have not had the zeal to read or re-read that entire bookshelf for the present purpose; nor do I imagine that the reader wants any such thorough and fanatic work. Let me not pretend to be able to prove anything. Let me peaceably point to those of Colette's merits, here and there in her work, which I regard as components of greatness; going upon the assumption that in the essentials, as to general literary standards, the reader will agree with me. Easy does it! As it happens I can claim an uncommon familiarity with all of Colette's work. This winter, just before the editor of the Permanent Library offered me this opportunity to pay her my respects, I came -viii- |