is given of the chief buildings in parallel columns with their dates. It must not be imagined, however, that two con- temporary buildings represent of necessity the same stage in the art-development of the two countries. They may, or they may not. Amiens and Salisbury do so very fairly; Notre Dame and Peterborough not at all. Other circum- stances and conditions must also be allowed for, to which it is impossible to do more than refer very briefly from time to time. Amongst the chief of these are the different schools of art, with their different traditions and resources which ex- isted at the same time in the two countries. In France, especially, it is impossible really to grasp the true story of her thirteenth-century art without knowing what these were, how Provence, Burgundy, Champagne, Auvergne, and Anjou had each their influence on the Ile de France, as well as Normandy and the Beauvaisis. Yet considera- tions of space compel us to limit our outlook to these last. In the same way in England but little stress has been laid on the difference between the strong, broad treatment of the Northern builders, as contrasted with the rather more detailed beauty of south-eastern England, with the bold soaring perpendicular and glorious timber work of the wealthy shipbuilding eastern counties, or the keen, clever masoncraft of Gloucester, rich in its stores of Cotteswold oolite. Again in the Isle of Wight, where timber was scarce, very little is used in the construction of the churches, and many of the porches are covered with stone slabs supported by arched ribs without any framework of wood, and the mould- ings over the doors and windows are unusually bold. In some parts of Essex, from the want of stone, the churches are poor in architectural display, and many of the belfries are of wood. In the north of Herefordshire, a thinly in- habited and woody district, we meet with many small plain Norman or Early English churches, consisting only of a nave and chancel, with sometimes a low, square, Early English tower rising only to the ridge of the nave roof. Many churches in Wales, and in parts of Cornwall, are exceedingly plain and poor in design, owing to the hard grtit or granite not being suitable for mouldings, and many -xxx- |