Christ, there are instances in which he seems to use the term spirit in connection with human faculties and temperament as a modern would. But by the Spirit of Jesus, as a rubric for some of the contents of the gospels, we mean (a) the divine power pos- sessed by Jesus on earth, and (b) the divine power which came upon His followers after His resurrec- tion, rendering their life stable and effective. Jesus has a spirit of His own, like any one else (cf. Mark ii. 8, viii. 12), but the second Marcan passage is omitted, and the former altered, by Matthew and Luke, possibly from considerations of reverence, although Matthew describes how Jesus gave up his spirit on the cross ( xxvii. 50; cf. Eccles. xii. 7, Luke xxiii. 46). Luke, on the other hand, adds that Jesus as a child developed in spirit (έκραταιου+̃το U+03COνεΊματι), and lays stress upon the power and presence of the Holy Spirit in Jesus during His ministry (cf. e.g. iv. 1, 14, iv. 18 f., x. 21). In the Fourth gospel 'the spirit' of Jesus is twice men- tioned ( xi. 33, xiii. 21) in connection with perturba- tion of soul, quite in the popular usage of the term; the characteristic doctrine of the Spirit has to be sought elsewhere. (i) In the synoptic gospels, the only occasion on which Jesus mentions the Spirit in connection with His mission is in self-defence, when the Pharisees declared that His power of expelling evil spirits was due to collusion with Satan. He claims that He exercises this power by the Holy Spirit, i.e. as pos- sessed by the Spirit of God, which works for the establishment of the divine reign on earth by over- throwing the reign of Satan ( Matt. xii. 28, a passage from Q, where Luke characteristically -- cf. i. 55, -178- |