THE CLASH OF ISSUES In Congress: Defending The Tariff Act of 1824, Henry Clay declaimed: ". . . the bill may be postponed, thwarted, defeated. But the cause is the cause of the country, and it must and will prevail. It is founded in the interests and affections of the people. It is as native as the granite deeply embosomed in our mountains. And, in conclusion, I would pray God, in His infinite mercy, to avert from our country the evils which are impending over it, and, by enlightening our councils, to conduct us into that path which leads to riches, to greatness, to glory." And attacking the bill, George McDuffie replied: "And, sir, let it be remembered that a revenue system, grossly and palpably unequal in itself -- a system which, under the most favorable modification, would levy the entire amount of the federal taxes from one-fifth part of the productions of the Union, while the other four- fifths are entirely exempted from all manner of imposition -- let it be remembered, I say, that this is the substratum upon which has been reared this monstrous and iniquitous superstructure -- the protecting system. . . . "Let me, then, beseech the advocates of that system, in the name of our common ancestors, whose blood was mingled together as a com- mon offering at the shrine of our common liberty -- let me beseech them, by all the endearing recollections of our common history, and by every consideration that gives value to the liberty and union of these States, to retrace their steps as speedily as possible, and relieve a high-minded and patriotic people from an unconstitutional and oppressive burden, which they cannot longer bear." Among the Economists: Daniel Raymond (1820) reasoned this way: "A measure of government may interfere with the private interests of an individual, or a class of individuals; but if at the same time, it promotes in a greater degree, the interests of a larger class of indi- viduals, it will be beneficial to the nation, and will promote national wealth. . . . "National wealth, is the effect of national industry. If you would increase the effect, you must add new force and power to the cause. A most effectual method to do this, is to give to national industry a monopoly of the home market." But Thomas R. Dew (1829) saw the problem in a different light: "This, then, is the great principle which will ever ensure the proper application of labour and capital. The vigilant eye of government is not required to watch over any of the departments of industry. Man is governed by his interests. His interest will generally prompt him into that employment, where all the advantages taken together are -ix- |