removal of the Cuban sugar quota and its redistribution to other foreign nations--the so-called Cuban windfall--provided the United States with an enticing economic opportunity to manipulate Dominican policy. Between 1958 and 1962, the United States played an instrumental role in the transition from authoritarian dictatorship to democracy in the Dominican Republic. 4 Since sugar was the basis of the Dominican political economy, the principal vehicle of persuasion used by the United States to push the Dominican Republic along the path toward democracy was the promise of a generous preferential sugar quota. The Dominican government, however, also manipulated the United States. Dominican policy makers used the threat of international communism, especially after Fidel Castro's success in Cuba, to increase the US sugar quota, ostensibly to provide the economic resources that would help forestall communist infiltration. In reality, the funds were used by Dominican elites for their own self-serving purposes. Four events, all of which revolved around the Dominican sugar industry, made 1961 a pivotal year in US-Dominican foreign relations: (1) President Kennedy canceled General Trujillo's participation in the Cuban windfall quota; (2) Trujillo was assassinated and his twelve sugar mills became state property; (3) Dominican President Joaquín Balaguer, in return for the promise of a generous preferential sugar quota, began moving his nation along the road to democracy; and (4) plans were made to lift US economic and political sanctions against the Dominican Republic and enlarge the Dominican sugar quota. In 1961, John D. Barfield, the US Consul in Ciudad Trujillo, stated: "The most significant period in the history of the Dominican Republic vis-à-vis the United States may well be the period 1958 to the present and there is every reason to believe the near future will be even more pregnant with significance for US policy objectives." 5 The extremely fluid Dominican political situation from Trujillo's assassination on 30 May 1961 to the establishment of a Consejo de Estado (Council of State) in January 1962 allowed the sugar quota to be a very effective political tool. The US offer to expand the sugar quota became an increasingly useful incentive to Dominican political change, and likewise the withholding of the sugar quota became a conceivable US deterrent to political digression in the Dominican Republic. 6 On the other hand, however, Dominican threats that the failure to obtain a generous preferential sugar quota inhibited the Dominican government's efforts to thwart possible communist menaces that might arise at home invariably conditioned US initiatives and responses. NOTES | 1. | Howard J. Wiarda and Michael J. Kryzanek, The Dominican Republic: A Caribbean Crucible ( Boulder, CO: Westview, 1982), p. xiii. According to Wiarda and Kryzanek, the Dominican Republic is "a microcosm of the immense changes sweeping all of Latin America and the Third World, a test case, a crucible of the issues and wrenching conflicts of the development process." | | | | -2- |