effects of recombination of the different sorts of qualifies contained in the parental strains. His attack on the hypothesis of rejuvenation that was so generally held at that time did very great service in exposing the mystical nature of such an imagined effect of cross- fertilization. In particular, Weismann's endeavor to connect the theory of recombination with the facts of maturation of the egg and sperm has opened our eyes to possibilities that had never been realized before. His work has led directly to the third advance that has been made in very recent years, when the results of Mendelian segregation have been applied directly to the study of fertility and sterility. As I have said, Darwin's work showed that cross- fertilization is generally beneficial. The converse proposition has long been held that continued inbreed- ing leads to degeneration and to sterility. This opinion rests largely on the statements of breeders of domesti- cated animals and plants, but there is also a small amount of accurate data that seems to support this view. I propose first to examine this question, and then consider what cross-fertilization is supposed to do, in the light of the most recent work. Weismann inbred white mice for 29 generations, and Ritzema-Bos bred rats for 30 generations. In each case the number of young per litter decreased in successive generations, more individuals were sterile and many individuals became weakened. This evi- dence falls in line with the general opinion of breeders. On the other hand, we have Castle's evidence on inbreeding the fruit fly through 59 generations. He found some evidence of the occurrence of sterile pairs -195- |