CONCLUSION The clearest conclusion to be drawn from this analysis may be that civil rights is, itself, a multi-faceted dimension, with responses varying in important ways depending on the sector and the level of specificity addressed by the question. Overall, there does seem to be both declining support for civil entitlements and less-than-enthusiastic support for them. Fewer people now than before think that government should assure that blacks get jobs. Respondents seem to think that the current pace of civil rights activity, with all its deficiencies, is "about right" (given that they were offered the option of saying it is going too slowly). Increasing proportions of people seem to think that blacks have made real progress. Citizens are divided on the issue of protecting the rights of the accused and of the equality of women's roles. While the picture is not dismal at all, it certainly is not overly enthusiastic to the provision of entitlements. The elderly seemed to think much like everyone except for the issues of crime and women's equality. On those two specific issues, the elderly took a more conservative or traditional or hard-line position than those of the younger age groups. They were more willing to support "stop crime" activities and more likely to support more traditional roles for women. The potential vulnerabilities of the elderly group need to be taken into account. So, too, does that fact that a higher proportion of the elderly are women. A substantial number of them may have experienced equality of roles in a more traditional way, as, for example, in a farm family context. This may have provided a framework for their answers. I suspect, based on the data, that the age of entitlements may have reached its current peak and may now be on the downswing. Among other pressures, cost looms large. Rights, whatever else they may involve, cost money. In a period of economic retrenchment people may begin to see a superfluity of rights. "Back to basics" may mean, in this context, back to a period when society did not have to pay fully for the fruits of all the labors it enjoyed. 4 NOTES | 1. | The nature of this question spans three of our value realms: equity-adequacy, public-private, and struggle-entitlement. The "fair" treatment part suggests equity. The government part suggests public. The focus upon blacks suggests entitlement. As will be seen in a later chapter, the factor analytic approach links this question with some of those from the other dimensions. It was located here, however, because of the specific focus on blacks in the question wording. | | | | | 2. | Ignoring "don't know" answers can be the basis for major error. Assume we have one-hundred "no opinion" respondents, for example. They would be distributed as they are in figure 13. If we remove the "don't know" group from the | | | | -109- |