properties, the acid derived from asparagin, that Des- saignes, who had no preconceived idea to put him on his guard, was very excusable for having confused the two. This synthetic aspartic acid is especially interesting in that it can be transformed into malic acid by the methods of Piria, and we may well believe that Pasteur was curious to know what malic acid one would obtain with it. Experiment shows that we obtain a malic acid identical with the natural acid, save that it is inactive on polarized light, as are also its salts. This is not all; the field grows more fertile as we cultivate it. The active malic acid of the sorb-tree or of the grape corresponds to one of the active tartaric acids. To what was this now malic acid comparable? To the paratartaric acid inactive by compensation? Pasteur had, against this interpretation, an objection which is no longer valid. " Dessaignes, the father of this malic acid, would "he thought, "in this case have created two molecules endowed with rotary power at the expense of one inactive molecule, but it is impossible to create a single active molecule, to say nothing of two." We know today, not only that the thing is possible, but that it has been realized. It is very probable, if not absolutely demonstrated, that the aspartic acid manufactured by Dessaignes was a combination of the right- and left-handed acids. It is certain that the malic acid which Pasteur had had in his hands was also a paratartaric acid. This error at the outset vitiated the memoir which Pasteur had devoted to comparing the aspartates and malates with each other and with the tartrates. The majority of the deductions which he had drawn from these compari- sons are inexact, and must be abandoned. But there are some which survive and which we should note. Even in the early years of his life as savant, Pasteur -33- |