After Pasteur, Cohn had studied the mode of formation and the resistance of these spores in Bacillus subtilis, and had put forth the hypothesis that the bacteria of an- thrax possibly behaved like this bacillus. But none of these precedents detract in the least from the merit of Koch: it was he who showed the rôle of the spore in the etiology of anthrax, and he did it in a way truly mar- vellous for its simplicity. If one places in the thermostat or even leaves exposed to summer heat a drop of fresh beef-blood serum or of the aqueous humor of the eye, sown with a very small fragment of fresh spleen from a mouse affected with anthrax, a microscopical examination at the end of 15 to 18 hours shows the following appearances: in the center of the slide which covers the preparation, where the air cannot penetrate easily, the bacilli are in their original state and have not elongated. Half way, from the edges of the cover-glass the bacilli are longer, twisted and bent and so much the more elongated as they are nearer the margin. Certain ones, those which are most in contact with the outer air, contain typical spores, sometimes arranged regularly in the filament like beads ( Fig. 20, left side). Ultimately these free themselves from the envelope in which they are formed. They are then disseminated through the liquid like an amor- phous powder. But this dust is living, for, if transferred to a new drop of serum, there spores produce at the end of 3 or 4 hours new bacilli, capable, like the first, of causing the death of the animal inoculated with them. There is then no diminution of virulence in passing through the spore state. We see that Koch, passing over and beyond Davaine, who had not thought of it, was not satisfied to repeat Delafond's cultural experiments. He succeeded in the first attempt in doing that which Delafond had tried -242- |