tion lie, he did worse, he believed it. To be willing to believe so scandalous a tale respecting such men, except upon what may strictly be called evidence, is not creditable to the heart or the understand- ing of any man. To persist in believing it for fifteen years, after it had been completely disproved, to avow a belief in it, for political purposes, just as he was sinking into the grave, revealed a phase of character which we have a right to call detestable. We owe it to the interests of human nature to execrate such conduct. If General Jackson was passive during the campaign of 1824, he was passive no longer. The exposure of the circum- stances attending his marriage, accom- panied by unjust comments and gross exaggerations, the reflections upon his mother, the revival of every incident of his life that could be unfavorably con- strued, kept him in a blaze of wrath. Determined to triumph, he took an active part, at home and abroad, in the canvass. He was elected; but, in the moment of his triumph, his wife, than whom no wife was ever more tenderly beloved, was lost to him for ever. The calamity that robbed life of all its charm deepened, and, as it were, sanctified his political resentments! His enemies had slain her, he thought. Adams had per- mitted, if he had not prompted, the cir- culation of the calumnies that destroyed her. Clay, he firmly believed, had orig- inated the crusade against her; for this strange being could believe any evil thing of one whom he cordially hated. Broken in spirit, broken in health, the old man, cherishing what he deemed a holy wrath, but meaning to serve his country well, went to Washington, to find it crowded with hungry claimants for reward. Oh, what an opportunity was his! Oh, if he could but have buried the hateful past in oblivion, and risen to the height of his letters to Mr. Monroe! Or, if he could only have devised some other mode of avenging his private wrongs! How different were the condition of public affairs in this year 1860, how different the prospect before us, if, instead of that vague and ominous paragraph about "reform," in his inaugural address, he had used language like this: "KNOW, all whom it may concern, that in this republic no man should seek, few men should decline, a public trust. To apply for office, fellow-citizens, is of itself an evidence of unfitness for office. I will appoint no man to an office who seeks one, or for whom one is sought. When I want a man, I shall know how to find him. If any one has indulged the expectation that I will deprive hon- est and capable men of their places be- cause they thought proper to oppose my election to the presidency, and, in the heat of an exciting canvass, went beyond the limits of a fair and proper opposi- tion, I notify them now and here, that Andrew Jackson, imperfect and faulty as he is, is not capable of conduct so despicable. Depart hence, ye office- seeking crew, whose very presence here shows that your motives for supporting me were base!"
Such a paragraph as this would have astonished the office-seekers; but the people would have sustained him, would now sustain any president who should utterly defy the office-seeking horde. General Jackson's appointment-and- removal policy I consider an evil so great and so difficult to remedy, that if all his other public acts had been per- fectly wise and right, this single feature of his administration would suffice to render it deplorable rather than admir- able. The captain of a ship who should -12- |