to have been a cottage of the better sort, such as a small farmer might occupy to-day, and such as at that time a well-to-do yeoman's son might live in without losing caste. Edmund Drake, so Stowe tells us, was by trade a sailor, and there is no reason for doubting his statement. 1 At any rate he does not appear upon the Subsidy Rolls as an inhabitant of Tavistock until 1544. His goods were at that time assessed at 4l., which indicates a certain pros- perity as things went then. It may well have come from the sea, and since his first child Francis was probably born in the following year it would look as though he had thought it entitled him to marry and settle down. John Drake the elder was assessed at 20l. and John the younger at 5l., so that they may be regarded as fairly well-to-do people, who adequately upheld the position of the family. There had been Drakes of Tavistock from time im- memorial, and moderate as were the circumstances of the Crowndale family it would seem they had come of gentle blood. What precisely was the connection with the higher branches of the family is not clear, but in the days of Francis Drake's renown they were glad to call him cousin, and to admit his claim to bear the Wyvern or Waver-Dragon gules, which was the ancient cognizance of the house. The well-known story to the contrary which Prince has to tell in his 'Worthies of Devon' was perhaps never meant to be taken seriously. He relates that Sir Francis upon receiving his knighthood from the queen in 1581 assumed the family arms without authority, and that Mr. Bernard Drake of Asshe, who claimed to be head of the name, boxed his ears at Court for the im- pertinence. The queen thereupon, to soothe her favourite's ____________________ | 1 | Barrow, who overlooked the obvious error of Camden's account, pre- ferred it to Stowe's, and for reasons which now seem inadequate rejected this account of Edmund Drake's trade. | -58- |