3 Assessing Psychopathy in Adults: The Psychopathy Checklist-Revised and Screening Version Robert H. Bodholdt U.S. Department of Justice, Bastrop, Texas Henry R. Richards Johnson, Bassin, & Shaw, Inc., Silver Spring, Maryland Carl B. Gacono Center for Therapeutic Assessment, Austin, Texas The purpose of this chapter is to provide a brief introduction -- or a refresher -- to the revised version of the Hare ( 1991) Psychopathy Checklist (PCL-R). Research examining the PCL-R has reached a stage where it has become a subject for analysis and review, as in the case of meta-analytic studies of the PCL-R and recidivism. Various issues associ- ated with the introduction of a new assessment device have passed the point of mere identification and provide the basis for what we hope is an engaging review. The clinician chooses assessment instruments and methods based on the clinical setting, referral question, and patient presentation. In foren- sic and correctional settings, where referral questions often involve issues of prediction, advances in psychopathy assessment have accorded the PCL-R a central role in many types of evaluations. Numerous and replicated findings indicate that psychopathy acts as a robust predictor of criminal activity and violent recidivism ( Hare, 1991 ; Quinsey, Harris, Rice, & Cormier, 1998 ). Fulero ( 1995) wrote of the PCL-R: "state of the art . . . both clinically and in research use" (p. 454). Altogether, one could argue that clinicians working in settings where referral for evaluation of psychopathy might be indicated have some obligation to be familiar with the PCL-R and its use ( Gacono, Nieberding, Owen, Rubel, & Bodholdt, 2000 ). -55- |