ing to which he was to turn his attention. No amount
of work seemed too arduous for him; when the gen-
eral meeting of the Committee was concluded, he
would often continue to work on sub-committees,
superintending the difficult details of execution until
the small hours of the night. He had the capacity of
concentrating himself upon the task before him, de-
terred by nothing -- by no fear of ridicule, no dread
of interference with his own business interests, no
thought of possible adverse criticism. . . . He knew
not only how to initiate and to decide, but how to lis-
ten, to compare, and to conclude. He had the capa-
city, while listening with the utmost consideration to
all suggestions, of weighing opinions rather than
counting them. His own judgment, based always
upon the widest and fullest consideration of all the
facts placed before him, was clear-cut, final, and
trustworthy."

After the Committee was constituted, Baldwin
wrote out a "preliminary statement" of the policy
agreed upon among the working members. The dif-
ferences between his provisional and final printed
declaration reveal the difficulty encountered by the
Committee in making the precise objects clear to the
public. They were all men who knew that the first
and last danger of heralded reforms was in exciting
too high hopes; of inviting failure by promising what
could not be performed. In rough preliminary notes,
Baldwin sketches the evil in the tenements together

-257-