seminal, case, the observation serves to introduce us to a general understanding of these pieces. For if a prelude in the earlier sense is intended to establish a mood, and these preludes succeed only in doing that (in the sense of omitting the presumably more impor- tant matter to follow), then the whole notion of setting mood, of striking poses, is thrown into stark relief. Indeed, emotional and stylistic mood is the very hallmark of the nineteenth century, the romantic style. The prior periods featured in some variety their own allowable moods, but the nineteenth century specializes in it--starting, of course, with the emotionally charged moods of Beethoven, and typified most simply by the feeling-laden world of grand opera, ballet, and tone poem. In the Chopin preludes we have twenty-four distinct moods, each in miniature. The group as a whole may stand almost as a summary of the imaginable mood types available to the romantic composer, a veritable museum of the expressive possibilities opening up to the composer in Chopin's century. Taken as a whole, the preludes present each mood attempted, posed, considered, and then dropped delicately as the silence between the pieces ushers in the next, while also setting to rest the previous. So we find among these types the combative, the brooding, the proud, the tender, the skittish, and so forth: words being plainly inadequate, even in the introspective sense, to cap- ture their emotionally concrete suggestions. They may likewise be seen as experiments in musical surface, in the formation of sur- face expressive of a certain frame of musical attitude or mind. One may be enigmatic, another despairing, another jubilant, and the like. The question of the organic unity and status of the collection-- are these preludes twenty-four pieces, or one (in twenty-four parts)?--is not just interesting, but perhaps unique. Clues to an answer may lie in comparison with other like groupings. Chopin himself, as any piano student knows, wrote pieces in clusters, the title--indicating a "type"--held in common. Thus there are the waltzes, the mazurkas, and so forth, where "the" ought really to appear in quotes, to cast doubt on the significance of the grouping as any more than a convenience. When we hear in succession a number of his waltzes, say, we experience one and then another of a certain kind of piece; they don't fit together as much as simply -xiv- |