ject with its reprehensible distortion of the legislative process needs to be understood. The Tellico Dam had its hypothetical conception as early as 1936, when the TVA identified all the potentially dammable sites in the Tennessee Valley system. It did so on the basis of the original 1933 mandate for the TVA to maintain and operate properties then owned by the United States in the vicinity of Muscle Shoals, Alabama, in the interest of national defense, for agricultural and industrial development, and to improve navigation and flood control on the Tennessee and Mississippi River basins. 1 Until 1966, however, the Tellico site received low priority as the TVA proceeded to build hydroelectric dams and flood-control structures among some sev- enty other originally identified locations throughout the Tennessee Valley. But by 1960, with more than sixty dams built, the TVA fastened onto the only remaining area of the Little Tennessee River that still flowed unim- peded for some thirty-three miles at its mouth into the Big Tennessee. As anticipated, the TVA acquired 38,000 acres for the Tellico project. More than 16,000 acres were eventually inundated by the dam, and the remaining acreage was slated for development having industrial, commercial, resi- dential, and recreational applications. The project, however, would sacri- fice more than seven hundred farms of some of the most fertile, prime growing land in the entire country and restrain the last stretch of free-flow- ing river favored by regional fishermen and canoeists. In addition, the impounded water, projected as a vast recreational lake and shoreland development by the TVA, would submerge Chota, the ancient Cherokee capital, along with the historic Cherokee villages of Citico, Toqua, Tomotley, Mialaquo, Tuskegee--the birthplace of Sequoyah, and Tanasee, from which the state of Tennessee derived its name. Although Cherokee villages once covered the Southern Appalachians with hunting grounds extending across Tennessee, Kentucky, Alabama, and Georgia, one of the densest concen- trations of Cherokee life and culture had flourished in these and other villages now slated for submersion. Moreover, given the Cherokee cus- tom of burying the dead near the places where they had lived, the entire 16,000 acres to be flooded contained the grave sites of thousands of Chero- kee ancestors. Local resistance by those whose historical roots and way of life would be destroyed by the Tellico project were not enough to stop the powerful linkage between the TVA, the pork-barrel congressional committees, local politicians, and land speculators. Congress appropriated funds for the project in 1966, and the concrete portion of the dam was completed by 1968. But before earthen dikes could be positioned for the actual impound- ment of the river, a lawsuit was initiated by the Environmental Defense -10- |