have received a great deal of attention since then. This lack is felt more keenly at the level of the study of bastardy across the Greek world as a whole than at that of the study of bastardy in the single city that is all too often identified with totality of ancient Greece: classical Athens. There are a number of successful treatments of bastardy in this city, of which Cynthia Patterson's article of 1990 deserves particular mention among more recent contributions, and H. J. Wolff's article of 1944 among the older. But bastardy in other parts and times of the Greek world has been relatively neglected. When it is discussed, it is typically with the purpose of elucidating the classical Athenian material. 4 The tendency of this procedure is the construction of a monolithic, Athenocentric Greek bastardy. Worse still, when scholars focusing on other issues away from classical Athens feel they need exegesis on the matter of bastardy, they tend to turn directly to classical Athens for their answers: thus Lotze assumes that Spartan nothoi, 'bastards', are the children of two unmarried citizen parents on the basis that children of such a category would have been termed nothoi at Athens, but we shall see in Part II that it is highly un- likely that the word bears this significance in a Spartan context. 5 It is therefore particularly important for this book to give detailed and focused scrutiny to the evidence for Greek bastardy outside Athens, and to stress the differences in the bastardy practices of other states. THE PURPOSE OF THE BOOK AND ITS ORGANIZATION It is, therefore, the main purpose of this book to provide a treat- ment of the most important evidence available for the subject of bastardy in the Greek world. Bastardy is an inherently complex and messy subject, since it consists of a series of concepts and practices that interface with and come under pressure from all the social institutions mentioned above. The exercise is therefore more centrifugal than centripetal. The material is laid out in broadly chronological fashion, moving from the archaic (Introduction, Parts I and II), through the classical (Parts I, II, and III), to the hellenistic period (Parts ____________________ | 4 | e.g. Patterson 1990: 47-54. | | 5 | Lotze 1962: 432. | -2- |