of the Empire, a speech in honour of the Athenians who had died in the war with Sparta; and it has become famous as an expression of the ideals which excited Athens in the generation before Plato. Plato parodies this speech in his Menexenus. The ideals are high, but not exclusively moral according to our way of thinking. Naked imperial- ism plays a large part in them, and Pericles is more concerned with the fine figure that Athens is cutting than with justice to the allies whom she was turning into subjects. She ruled them in an ever more grasping and tyrannical fashion, and used their tribute to build the temples on the Acropolis which still amaze us, as well as for the navy which was the basis of her power. Recalcitrant cities were punished with increasing severity as the fear of successful rebellion began to bite: Mytilene was threatened with massacre but reprieved at the eleventh hour; Melos actually suffered total extinction. Reading dialogues like the Gorgias with the history of the Athenian Empire in mind, we can see that Plato was reacting with moral revulsion to an attitude of mind current in Greece at the national as well as the personal level: an attitude which valued honour and glory above the virtues which enable people to 'dwell together in unity'. Of the founders of the Empire he says 'Not moderation and uprightness, but harbours, and dockyards, and walls, and tribute-money, and such nonsense, were what they filled the city with' (519a). For nearly all the last third of the fifth century, until her defeat in 405 BC, Athens was almost constantly at war with Sparta, which with her allies resisted and in the end brought down the Athenian power. Plato was old enough to have fought in the last part of the war, as all citizens were required to, but we have no reliable record of his military service. A man of his class would naturally have served in the cavalry; and his brothers are said in the Republic to have fought well (368a). The mention of Plato's social position may remind us that there was another dimension to the struggles of the Greek cities during this and the next century. The warfare was not merely between but within the cities. Almost every city was divided politically between the upper class and the rest of the free citizens (the numerous slaves can be left out of this political reckoning). This must not be taken as implying that there were no well-born democrats; indeed patrician -2- |