11 Law, Moral Philosophy, and Economics in Environmental Discourse 1. INTRODUCTION The analysis so far presented has tried to establish a way of thinking about fairness in international law and has sought to apply those insights to the process by which law is made in the international community, stressing first, the participation of people and peoples and secondly, the burgeoning role of international institutions in conflict resolution. Fairness discourse, however, is not solely about process. The importance of process lies in its effect on outcomes. Outcomes are cardinal indicators of fairness. Outcomes also provide a measure of the fairness of the process by which they are fashioned. Now that our focus has shifted from how law is made to what law is made, our critical examination of the system shifts from emphasis on 'no trumping' and legitimacy theory to an examination of the distributive justice achieved by law and institutions. To demonstrate this aspect of fairness critique, we will examine two clusters of rapid growth in international law and institutions, clusters in which questions of distributive justice may readily be identified, but in which answers are elusive and often refer us back to process. The first of these clusters is concerned with the environment, the second with trade and development. 2. AN INVENTORY OF ENVIRONMENTAL FAIRNESS ISSUES Our biosphere is being degraded and depleted at an alarming rate. Scientists have warned that this applies to the seas, major freshwater sources, the atmosphere, forests, tropical agricultural lands, and even species. Specialists have pointed to the consequences: diminishing fish stocks, atmospheric warming and flooding, ozone depletion probably conducing to rising rates of cancer, aerial pollution with consequent respiratory disease, desertification and hunger, and the threatened or actual extinction of species, from micro- organisms to the elephant, whale, and black rhino. This raises the question: are persons--those now alive and those yet to be born--to be legally entitled to a quality of life which is globally applicable and, where necessary, globally implemented and enforced? -351- |