Another misconception, of quite a different type, is the close
association of the names Wyatt and Surrey, the "Dioscuri of the
dawn," "the twin stars of the Reformation." So far as the latter
phrase be applied to Surrey, whatever evidence there is points in
entirely the opposite direction. Religion was then joined with
politics, and the party of the reformers found in Surrey an active
antagonist. Sir Edward Knyvet deposed that when he learned
of Cromwell's fall, he exclaimed: "Nowe is that foul churl dead
so ambitious of others blode; nowe is he stricken by his owne staffe"
and this in spite of the fact that it was by Cromwell's intercession
that he himself had escaped mutilation only three years before.
The feeling for his caste obliterated the sense of the merely personal
obligation. But such sentiments would scarcely commend him
to Wyatt, who did belong to the other party and who was one of
the "minions" of Cromwell. The political differences, moreover,
were not compensated for by a similarity in age. Wyatt was fifteen
years older than Surrey, and, as at the time of his death
Surrey was but twenty-nine, this difference was marked. Surrey
belonged to a younger generation. He was but little older than
Wyatt's son, and in fact it was in company with the latter that
he scandalized London. It is Wyatt the younger that he takes
with him on his French expedition. Consequently the usual im-
plication in discussing the relationship between them, that they
were intimates, needs careful revision.

That they were acquaintances, however, is equally clear from
the same facts. But it does not rest alone upon inference. We
have three poems by Surrey referring to Wyatt; one is in praise
of the translations of the Psalms, and two are elegies on his death.
Of these three the two Elizabethan sonnets are conventional. The
third is worth quoting in this connection. ¹

W. resteth here, that quick could neuer rest:
Whose heauenly giftes encreased by disdayn,
And vertue sank the deper in his brest.
Such profit he by enuy could obtain.

family name of the Fitzgeralds. Bapst's suggestion that Garret is a diminutive
from Margaret is not plausible. I am unable to conjecture why Tottel made
this alteration, unless this poem belongs, or he thought it belonged, to the same
period and related the same affair.

-518-