| | 3rd Level: Performance is clearly unsatisfactory in this particular area at the present time. | The standards for measurement are revised annually and include suggestions from all users. The categories on which programs are graded follow the goals of the organization's mission statement. These categories are Identification, Protection (Projects), Protection (Other), Stewardship, Development (Project/Program), Development (Operations), Institution Building, State Office Management and Administration. The nine major categories are further subdivided into as many as seven subcategories, and the score in each subcategory is eventually multiplied by 1, 2, or 3 before determining the single rating for the category. The nine major categories contribute equally to the overall score. To assess a state program, each of the nine categories should be reviewed separately. CONCLUSION The Nature Conservancy's cyclical approach to cost-effectiveness, therefore, is woven throughout its operational procedures. It does not depend on one or two specific tools applied periodically to measure cost-effectiveness. Rather, the methodology is focused on a continuous effort to carry the mission of the Conservancy throughout all aspects of the organization. By rating and evaluating each portion of the strategic plan, annual plan, budget, and, finally, internal feedback mechanisms, cost-effectiveness occurs within each program. NOTE | 1. | Each preserve may be composed of a number of land conservation projects partially owned or protected by conservation easements. | | | | -92- |