SAGA AND HISTORY IN order to learn at first hand who Moses was and the kind of life that was his, it is obviously necessary to study the Biblical narrative. There are no other sources worthy of serious considera- tion; comparison of reports, normally the chief means of ascer- taining historical truth, is not possible here. Whatever has been preserved of Israel's traditions since ancient times is to be found in this one book. Not so much as the vestige of a chronicle dating from that period, or deriving from the nations with whom the Children of Israel established contact on their journey from Egypt to Canaan, has been preserved; and not the vaguest indication of the event in question is to be found in ancient Egyptian literature. The Biblical narrative itself is basically different in character from all that we usually classify as serviceable historical sources. The happenings recorded there can never have come about, in the historical world as we know it, after the fashion in which they are described. The literary category within which our historical mode of thinking must classify this narrative is the saga; and a saga is generally assumed to be incapable of producing within us any conception of a factual sequence. Further, it is customary to accept as a fundamental tenet of the non-dogmatic Biblical scholarship of our day the view that the tales in question belong to a far later epoch than the events related, and that it is the spirit of that later epoch which finds expression in them; or, even more, the spirit of the sundry and various later periods to which are ascribed the "sources", the different con- stituent parts of which the story is composed or compiled according to the prevalent view. Thus Homer, for example, to take an analogous case, provides us with a picture of the epoch in which he himself lived rather than of the one in which his heroes did their deeds. Assuming that to be the case, just as little could be ascertained regarding Moses' character and works as is to be ascertained of Odysseus; and we would perforce have to rest content with the possession of a rare testimony to the art with which court writers commissioned by the Kings of Israel, or the more popular (in the original sense of the word) prophets of the nation, wrought the image of its Founder out of material entirely inaccessible to us. -13- |