NOTES I wish to thank my women's studies students and colleagues at Kent State University, Stark Campus, and University of Central Florida, whose work has taught me so much. I am grateful to my colleague Nina Manasan Greenberg for helping me to clarify my thinking throughout the drafting of this manuscript. | 1. | While Atwood novel is widely taught in universities, the recently published Ap- proaches to Teaching Atwood's "The Handmaid's Tale" and Other Works includes no essays on how the book might be used in the women's studies classroom. See Wilson, Friedman, and Hengen ( 1996). | | | | | 2. | For lively discussions of the relationships among Atwood's feminism, cultural fem- inism, and The Handmaid's Tale, see McCarthy ( 1986); Ehrenreich ( 1986); Greene ( 1986); LeBihan ( 1991); Reesman ( 1991). | | | | | 3. | My assumptions about what is at stake in safety are, in large part, derived from Martin and Mohanty ( 1986) consideration of home as a metaphorical category. They maintain that feminist analyses and politics of safe space must acknowledge the ways that safety is constituted, that is, by inclusion and exclusion. | | | | | 4. | Here Burack ( 1988- 1989) work was really helpful in guiding me. | | | | | 5. | Miner ( 1991) discusses the dangers of the love plot to women. | | | | SUGGESTED READINGS Register C. 1979. Brief, a-mazing movements: Dealing with despair in the women's studies classroom. Women's Studies Quarterly 7 (Fall): 161-165. Wilson S. R., T. B. Friedman, and S. Hengen, eds. 1996. Approaches to teaching At- wood's "The Handmaid's Tale" and other works. New York: Modern Language Association. -200- |